Society has a lot to say about a lot of things, and one of the things that society often claims is that nudity is indecent. Many individuals may argue with that definition, but society as a collective continually demonstrates that it finds the naked human body improper and insists that it is covered in public.
"There seems to be a common misconception that simple nudity is sexual. By all means, call out inappropriate sexualised behaviour or comments as indecent.... the average person is engaged in sexual activity for 0.45% of their life."
Saying that sexual behavior is "indecent," offensive, or wrong attacks and spews hate at the "average person" who engages in normal sexual behavior for a significant part of his or her life. Sexual desire and behavior is the only thing that prevents species extinction. Average people all do it. Why on earth wold anyone be so rude and hateful to attack necessary and enjoyable activity that all normal people do?
Anyone who says that another person is inherently "indecent" is a hate mongering fool and extremely offensive. They insult and attack other people for existing as human.
Judges in several US states have ruled that people are NOT inherently indecent. Laws prohibiting "indecent exposure" mean that a person must be doing something indecent. Doing normal human activity while naked is not "indecent exposure." (Seattle v. Johnson for example)
"There seems to be a common misconception that simple nudity is sexual. By all means, call out inappropriate sexualised behaviour or comments as indecent.... the average person is engaged in sexual activity for 0.45% of their life."
Saying that sexual behavior is "indecent," offensive, or wrong attacks and spews hate at the "average person" who engages in normal sexual behavior for a significant part of his or her life. Sexual desire and behavior is the only thing that prevents species extinction. Average people all do it. Why on earth wold anyone be so rude and hateful to attack necessary and enjoyable activity that all normal people do?
Anyone who says that another person is inherently "indecent" is a hate mongering fool and extremely offensive. They insult and attack other people for existing as human.
Judges in several US states have ruled that people are NOT inherently indecent. Laws prohibiting "indecent exposure" mean that a person must be doing something indecent. Doing normal human activity while naked is not "indecent exposure." (Seattle v. Johnson for example)