Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peter Stokes's avatar

A well thought-out and expounded piece as usual, Steve. Nudism/naturism is what we want it to be, all those varieties you lay out; giving oneself a label has always left one open to another’s different understanding of that label, so adopting it is always a risk.

As nudism/naturism is not a protected characteristic or copyrighted title we’re stuck with the confusion if we choose to adopt the label.

For another perspective - policeman is a label worn all over the world, but people’s views of it vary wildly depending where they are! So we’re not alone with our label confusion.

I shall carry on avoiding any labels whenever I can, and wish everyone else well in their self-description.

Ournaturistlife.com's avatar

Great article. "Personally, my naturism is about my comfort. This may seem selfish, but I don't need a gender balance to make me feel better. If suddenly every other nudist decided that clothing was a better option, I would still be naked at home.

Do I wish that there were more women visible in naturism? Absolutely, but more specifically, I wish there were more people taking part in naturism."

I think what's key in this statement is that that gender balance is important. Because a perceived gender imbalance also prevents potential new naturists from taking part. If a woman only sees men participating, she may be very reluctant to join. We as men all need to do better to support those safe spaces for them.

Nice work!

10 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?