Never give up, never surrender
Just because something is unlikely, does that mean we shouldn’t try?
A few weeks ago I posted a blog questioning whether naturists were a minority, and suggesting that our numbers may be greater than we imagine. I also suggested that it is time to stand up and be counted, in an effort to gain momentum rather than stay standing silently in the shadows.
The post attracted a few comments from readers, and after only a few days had become one of my most popular posts.
I find it interesting how a single idea in a comment from a reader can trigger a response that transforms into a blog. I really value the feedback that my readers provide as it keeps my writing inspiration going, especially at times when I am struggling with something to say.
One reader, Jillian, wrote:
To answer the question in your headline, yes, naturists are a minority group when it comes to civil rights. Collectively, naturists' rights to be nude are limited and will remain so to greater and lesser degrees around the world. And the day will never come when people will have the right to walk naked down Main St. along with textile folks in the vast majority of cities around the world.
The rest of Jillian’s comment went on to acknowledge that as a minority, naturists do face discrimination, and that is why we write about it.
I believe that she is right. Outside of dedicated naturist communities, it is unlikely that naturists will ever be able to walk naturally down the street or engage with society generally without compromising our attitude toward clothing.
While that may be the case, does that mean that the idealists yearning for absolute freedom should lower their sights and aim for something more achievable? Surely if we aim high, even if we fall short, we may well end up with more than we currently have.
Society has the capacity to change. I accept that I am no spring chicken but I remember when smoking was common, it wasn’t really that long ago. Smoking was everywhere. In the workplace, public transport, cinemas, bars and restaurants and even aeroplanes. Of course, it wasn’t compulsory, there were non-smoking sections, but sitting on a bus where half the bus smokes really doesn’t provide the cleanest air for the non-smoking section. I am sure that many of you will remember waking up in the morning after having been out to a pub or club the night before and the smell of the clothes you were wearing. Public attitudes to smoking have changed remarkably.
Society has a range of acceptable attitudes and policies, referred to as being within the Overton window, (named after American policy analyst Joseph Overton). Politicians are unlikely to support or promote policies outside the Overton window, no matter their personal beliefs. The Overton window shifts over time as attitudes change, and it could be argued that yesterday's dreamers and idealists pushed the boundaries on many issues that we now take as normal.
It may come as a surprise but there was a time when it was unheard of for women to vote. Many at the time may have thought that women voting was the dream of idealists and dreamers yearning for democratic equality
There was a time when Public buildings were not required to have wheelchair access or accessible bathrooms for people with disabilities. Now commonplace, thanks to the persistent campaigning of dedicated people, not so much dreamers and idealists but many simply frustrated by the lack of accessibility that they encountered every day.
There was a time, not that long ago when same-sex couples could not marry. It wasn’t much before that when same-sex couples weren’t allowed at all. In some societies, they still aren’t. Again the dreams of idealists yearning for equality have allowed what was once unthinkable to many, to become commonplace and broadly accepted.
What kind of progress can we expect to make without the committed and often criticised efforts of the dreamers and idealists?
In some parts of society, we are starting to see the beginnings of a shift in attitude towards topless equality for women. The free the nipple campaign is rightfully gaining acceptance in many parts of the world, and while there is a significant way to go before society corrects the discrimination against women who choose to go topless, progress is being made.
The day may never come when we can choose what not to wear, and walk down the street naturally, but that should not stop people from arguing and campaigning for change.
By aiming for more than we think is possible, we might not exceed our expectations but are certain to get more than we currently have.
Surely aiming for total acceptance of the naked human form as inherently decent has to be the default position.
“Ambition is the path to success. Persistence is the vehicle you arrive in.” – Bill Bradley
Thank you for reading, have a comfortable day.
Here in San Francisco, it used to be legal to walk through the city nude. I was among those who regularly did so. Seldom was I completely relaxed about strolling naked along busy streets, but it was exhilarating and I believe it was important. When I did achieve total ease about being nude, it was nirvana. A law limiting public nudity was passed in 2012, but we still have special events where it's permitted. I miss those adventurous walks, but what I miss even more is the freedom simply to check my mail or put out the garbage bins without covering up.
For those interested in hearing more about those times, as well as some of my other nudist experiences, here is a link to an interview I did with Naked Age podcast. The introduction gives broder historical info on public nudity in San Francisco and the Bay Area:
https://www.nakedage.co/episodes/episode/2c2455d6/san-francisco-naked-guy
There is a saying that one should not allow the best to be the enemy of the good. There is another saying that one should be very careful about picking the hill one is willing to die on.
OTOH, there's nothing ventured, nothing gained. And: People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.
There is no shortage of aphorisms to choose from. There is truth in all of them or they wouldn't be aphorisms.
I'd love to say we should do what BN did in Britain. But America is not Britain. We have all the Puritans and other religious extremists who fled Europe for 300 years. That had a central role in making us who we are. Their sectrarian descendants are still strong. Additionally, there is no BN equivalent in America. AANR doesn't give a hoot about free range nudity. The Naturist Society is too busy tearing itself apart. Lost its way about the time Lee Baxandall died.
There is no broadly based national organization. I suspect it is because there just aren't enough nudists to support one. Both entities are very tight lipped about membership. If it were booming they would be bragging about the numbers.
Most nude friendly people do not consider themselves nudists. Maybe they soak in a hot tub or hang around the house naked. If you look at the participants in the WNBR, most are not nudists. It is a lark. A wild and crazy thing to do just to say you did it. Resort nudists tend to stay in their resorts, protected by anonymity against social disapproval. None of these people will be of any use in changing the law because the law doesn't impact them.
A parallel I might make is that of legalizing marijuana. I don't think there has ever been a poll in the state of California indicating that people wanted an absolute ban on marijuana use.. I think in 1972, the state decriminalized it and turned it into a ticket. Once that happened legalization lost the wind in their sails. Marijuana use became very widespread as the chances of getting caught were extremely slim and the penalty for possession of under an ounce turned into a slap on the wrist. Legalization made the ballot several times over the next 45 years. Despite the fact that most Californians didn't care about pot, legalization did not pass until 2016.
If a lot of people only care a little for something and a few people are intensely opposed, the motion fails. Every time. Intensity of emotion is what gets voters to vote. Pot smokers saw only a small gain from legalization while opponents saw a lot to lose.
"Free range" nudies are not distributed evenly around the country. Neither are people who are nude tolerant. If there is an effort to be made, it needs to be in areas where the laws are tolerant, the people are tolerant and there is enough local interest that activism is possible. More than likely it will be a local club organized for the purpose and not an existing resort. That's how Friends of Bates Beach managed to convince Carpenteria to allow nudity on the northern end of the beach.
Larger national and regional organizations can focus money, lawyers, and other resources on spot efforts. In the case of Bates Beach, FOBS is is backed by the Southern California Naturists Association.
Greater public acceptance of nudity can best be promoted thru public events containing nudity. One such event is the WNBR. Another could be Spencer Tunick style mass photo shoots. Or participating in the Bay to Breakers nude or in any of the many SF events allowing nudity. Or nude Shakespeare in the park. Very public, out of the closet, officially approved nudity. Don't imagine this will swell the ranks of self declared nudists though. At most it will make public nudity a less remarkable event and soften a few hearts.
Also, if you don't do nude stuff when it is allowed, you'll soon lose that right as well. Rights that are not exercised are soon lost.
You won't rapidly change greater society. That can only happen through evolution and evolution is a very slow and glitchy process. How long has it taken for gays to gain general acceptance? Even now there are local areas where they do not have it. There are a lot more of them than nudists and they aren't as visibly different. Change what you can where you can.