Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Grahame Peck's avatar

An interesting point. I have never been a member of a landed club but I would identify as a naturist. I was raised by naturist parents and grandparents. Clothing was always optional as I grew up. It was normal for meals to be eaten with nude people at the table. Gardening was always done naked as were most recreational activities. I dont feel that not being in a "landed club" has denied me over time.

Personally I believe that hiding behind high fences and hedges implies that there is something wrong with it. Not a state I wish to portray. However if truly 14% of the uk population identify as naturists. That should be sufficient for a critical mass so long as they are prepared to publicly identify as such

Expand full comment
Peter Stokes's avatar

“people will choose a label to try and identify as a person with the same interests as others who identify and use the same label”

Oh, I so dislike labels! Naturist/nudist, so many variant labels of both, and some used - or at least interpreted - pejoratively. One person’s nudist is another’s pervert, my naturist is your exhibitionist.

We all use labels as shorthand descriptions, be it of ourselves or others, and they’re very useful ... up to a point. But what does that label mean to someone else? There’s probably not a naturist forum or blog that doesn’t have some sort of discussion or debate on the difference between a naturist or a nudist, and that’s among friends. But outside our circle our self-applied label can often carry very different meanings.

I prefer to avoid either naturist or nudist as my label (or to use the vernacular of the day, as my pronoun) and describe myself as someone who prefers to be naked over wearing clothes. Less room, I feel, for differences in interpretation and for misunderstandings if my naturist turns out to not be your naturist.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts