Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rokker's avatar

"Nudist Colony" - yes, quite an outdated term now. As kids we'd heard about nudist colonies and somehow gained the impression that they were some kind of weird cult that used nudity for some odd ceremonial practice or something similar - not that nudity of itself was the focus, because we already were comfortable with running around our Northland farm naked anyhow! And being naked has always been the norm for me and my siblings.

As for Nudist vs Naturist, I've preferred Naturist, mainly because it provides some context and reason behind being naked. But I'm getting to the point now where neither of those terms fits my lifestyle accurately. I tend to see nakedness as simply a choice of dress code, just like wearing shorts or a T shirt or overalls or anything else - just as it was when I was a kid. So "clothing optional" seems right to me. It doesn't matter to me if people around me are naked or wearing something - that's their choice. It's my body, and I should have the right to decide what, if any, pieces of cloth I hang on it!

Some great thoughts, Steve - well done. I like your closing "Imagine a world" paragraphs especially.

Expand full comment
sassycoupleok's avatar

We aren't fans of that term either. We prefer nude resort or clothing optional resort. Our home resort where we have been members for several years is OakLake Trails in central Oklahoma and is considered a clothing optional resort. The only places full is required are the two pools and hot tub.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?